Support per WP:PRIMARYTOPIC, given page views and WP:TWODABS.In ictu oculi ( talk) 20:01, 10 January 2017 (UTC) Having (1981 film) is actually helping people avoid Sattam Oru Iruttarai (2012 film) if that is the objective. Oppose For the same reasons stated only a couple of months ago and the guideline WP:NCF hasn't changed.Lugnuts Precious bodily fluids 08:06, 19 January 2017 (UTC) No, as neither of them appear to be the primary topic. Lugnuts:, are you willing to reconsider based on page view evidence below, along with Google Books results on long-term significance? It's hard to see how this fails WP:PRIMARYTOPIC and WP:TWODABS and it would be nice to build a consensus.Lugnuts Precious bodily fluids 19:27, 10 January 2017 (UTC) You've brought no new rationale to the table. Oppose For the same reasons stated only a couple of months ago.Andrewa ( talk) 03:18, 19 January 2017 (UTC) This is a contested technical request ( ). Sattam Oru Iruttarai (1981 film) → Sattam Oru Iruttarai – The 1981 film, a milestone in Tamil cinema, is clearly the primary topic as the 2012 travesty was named after it and hardly gained the same recognition. The result of the move request was: No consensus, so not moved BrownHairedGirl (talk) No further edits should be made to this section. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review.
#SATTAM ORU IRUTTARAI 1981 MOVIE ONLINE ARCHIVE#
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. TheFreeloader ( talk) 02:02, 7 November 2016 (UTC) Sometimes the remake is actually the primary topic, rather than the original, just look at Battlestar Galactica for instance. And you have not demonstrated that people are more likely to look for the original film rather than the remake. Primary topic is about which article a reader is most likely to be looking for when they search for a given term. For instance, the planet Mars is the primary topic for Mars, even though its name comes from the Roman god Mars. Primary topic is not about where the origin of a name is from.This is in a similar situation, and the above-linked WP:TWODABS states, "If there are only two topics to which a given title might refer, and one is the primary topic, then a disambiguation page is not needed-it is sufficient to use a hatnote on the primary topic article, pointing to the other article." This film is clearly the primary topic as the 2012 film is a remake of it, hence the reason it has the same title.
The result of the move request was: No consensus emerged from the discussion ( non-admin closure) - Andy W. ( talk) 01:34, 10 November 2016 (UTC) Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. The following is a closed discussion of a requested move.